- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 16:53:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Gosh I hate the grammar of the counter-* properties *so much*. But hm, we actually got lucky here; `none` is already disallowed as a counter name. So `counter-reset: list-item none;` could be unambiguous, if we change the grammar to be `[ <counter-name> [ <integer> | none ]? ]+`; saying `foo none` would be a no-op (not resetting) for every other counter name, but for `list-item` in particular it would give us that "if you refer to it we don't do the magic" behavior that counter-increment gets. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7227#issuecomment-1124014708 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2022 16:53:16 UTC