- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 21:14:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Agenda+ for resolution, since the discussion seems to have concluded. * for `revert-layer`: suggest closing no-change. There seem to be use-cases from authors that would benefit from the currently-specified `revert-layer` behavior, and there's not a significant perf impact, per Anders/Oriol. * for `revert`: suggest closing no-change (`revert` reverts the author-levels below the animation as well, stripping back to user origin), since this is what is already specced and implemented. Alternatively, we could sync it with `revert-layer` for convenience. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7083#issuecomment-1083631261 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2022 21:14:20 UTC