- From: vmpstr via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:43:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I agree this interaction needs clarification, tho. I can see two possibilities: I'm leaning towards 1, since we also have something like `content-visibility` that when applied to images does affect the contents (ie stops painting it). I think paint containment should clip any overflow that results from `object-view-box` that reason. All in all, I think Tab said it well in option 1: replace element's content should be treated as "content" which is subject to all of the things that "regular content" is subject to. -- GitHub Notification of comment by vmpstr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7144#issuecomment-1083308072 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2022 15:43:47 UTC