- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 23:09:55 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
These changes aim to: * clarify how the fit-content() limit caps the growth limit (at no point is it ever larger than a minmax(auto, [limit]) track) * apply the fit-content() limit as a cap when distributing space to base sizes, so that we don't blow past the fit-content() limit if other spanned tracks have infinite growth limits (but don't give it more space than a minmax(auto, max-content) track would get otherwise) The overall principle is to match the smaller of `minmax(auto, max-content)` and `minmax(auto, <var>limit</var>)`, similar to how `width: fit-content(<var>limit</var>)` is defined as `max(min-content, min(max-content, <var>limit</var>))`. If this looks good to you, we'll raise it to the WG for review! -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4549#issuecomment-1067389248 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 14 March 2022 23:09:56 UTC