Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-timing] spring() timing function (#280)

> > @birtles Has this gotten any further consideration?
> 
> @samhenrigold Yes, you can follow the discussion in #229. There's a very pragmatic and promising proposal from @jakearchibald starting here: [#229 (comment)](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/229#issuecomment-861247074)

The proposal would allow pre-calculating spring-like motion in discreete steps, but not "springs" as velocity driven value changes over time. Springs are useful because they retain the velocity throughout value changes, so the transition can look smooth regardless of how often the value is changed. That's not possible to define in discreete steps, so I'd say the proposal for a spring() function would still need further consideration. Perhaps I'm missing some discussions around this though.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by rihok
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/280#issuecomment-1065090471 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 11 March 2022 12:58:26 UTC