- From: mattwoodrow via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 03:48:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
mattwoodrow has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-grid-2] Clarify interaction between subgrid and position:absolute == This is somewhat similar to #7123, except for `position:absolute` instead of `position:relative`. If a subgrid is `position:absolute` should all `top/left/right/bottom` values be ignored, and we should just stretch and position across the corresponding grid area in the parent? Should we (similar to one option for `relative`) try to respect these as much as possible while still forcing the width/height to the stretched value (if both left and right are set, what's the precedence between each of these and the stretched width?)? What happens if a `position:absolute` subgrid doesn't cover any grid tracks and only covers the padding area of the parent (`grid-row: auto / 1`)? Should this be listed as an explicit reason that the specified value of `subgrid` isn't applied? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7124 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2022 03:48:33 UTC