Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes-2] Add the "rotate" keyword to shape() (#7105) from Noam Rosenthal via GitHub on 2022-03-07 (public-css-archive@w3.org from March 2022)

From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 19:30:25 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-1061054344-1646681422-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

> I'm not against this in principle (it probably does make things slightly more readable, actually), but what's the ambiguity concern? You can statically determine the type of a calc(); it'll only be a valid radius if the type is {length:1} or {percentage:1}, and a valid angle if the type is {angle:1}.

I didn't know that! But in any case it's ambiguous for reading, especially with custom properties

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by noamr
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/7105#issuecomment-1061054344 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 7 March 2022 19:30:26 UTC