- From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 16:20:24 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I don't have a strong opinion on how `revert` should behave for animations. I think when I wrote the [email in 2012](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0270.html), we'd spent a long time talking about origins as UA-user-author, and those origins do have value in that they reflect the [priority of constituencies](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/#priority-of-constituencies). Since then, we've moved towards a definition of origins that includes more items and more closely matches how implementations work. I still think there's some value in aligning with the priority of constituencies. However, I don't see a whole lot of use cases for `revert` in animations (though maybe I'm missing something), so if doing something different for animations makes things easier to implement, I think that's an entirely reasonable thing to do in order to save the implementation effort for things that are more valuable. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7083#issuecomment-1060871541 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 7 March 2022 16:20:25 UTC