- From: Brian Birtles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 02:48:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Jumping on the bikeshedding part here: I'd vote for _not_ using the term "phase" here when describing the relationship of the animation to element positioning/containment. Phases are already used in a few places like [effect phases](https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations-1/#animation-effect-phases-and-states) and the timeline phases mentioned above. In both cases they have values "before", "active", "after" (and "inactive") and are a read-only value describing something about the progress of the animation. This feels like quite a different use of the term such that overloading it would cause confusion. -- GitHub Notification of comment by birtles Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7044#issuecomment-1060133970 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 7 March 2022 02:48:48 UTC