- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:02:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I’m not going to weigh in on the actual debate, since I'm finding myself agreeing with both sides as I read this thread. However, I'd like to address this: > #### Cons > The only downside I am aware of is that GitHub Pages has some limitations the current [drafts.csswg.org](https://drafts.csswg.org/) doesn’t have — most notably an inability to do server-side redirects and an inability to set arbitrary HTTP response headers. > > However, those limitations in GitHub Pages are well-known and well-understood, and there are workarounds or mitigations. > > Lack of server-side redirects is probably the most-serious limitation — but it can be addressed by using client-side redirects instead. Admittedly not optimal, but does work — as evidenced by the fact [andreubotella.com/csswg-auto-build](https://andreubotella.com/csswg-auto-build/) is already using it. Netlify is very similar to GitHub Pages, but also supports [headers](https://docs.netlify.com/routing/headers/) and [redirects](https://docs.netlify.com/routing/redirects/) with a very easy declarative syntax, and I'm sure they'd be delighted to host this for free, since they host open source projects for free as well. -- GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7500#issuecomment-1187611276 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 18 July 2022 15:02:25 UTC