- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 16:41:05 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> That is one interpretation. Are you referring to the resolved value I expect for `atan2(1cm, 1mm)`? I could walk through and quote the steps in the spec to get to this result but it is best to let a CSSWG member answers you, yes. Regarding `<percentage>` in `atan2()` to replace a value that should match `<angle>`, I believe that [resolving the type of the function](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-type-checking) will fail: > `<percentage>`: if, in the context in which the math function containing this calculation is placed, `<percentage>`s are resolved relative to another type of value (such as in width, where `<percentage>` is resolved against a `<length>`), and that other type is not `<number>`, the type is determined as the other type. Otherwise, the type is `«[ "percent" → 1 ]»`. > > [...] > > For each of the above, if the type is failure, the math function is invalid. -- GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7482#issuecomment-1179760678 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 10 July 2022 16:41:07 UTC