Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations-1] Rethinking timeline-phase (#7240)

> Edited in. @birtles I renamed active/inactive to “states”, to avoid conflicting with the possible future named phases we're thinking of introducing in #7044. Lmk if the edits look OK to you and @flackr, and if so I'll publish an update to /TR.

Sure, dropping the timeline phases seems fine. That would bring the spec closer to its previous state: https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/WD-web-animations-1-20181011/#inactive-timeline where we had a concept of an "inactive timeline" but didn't have a "timeline state" concept. In fact, what do you think about simply reverting that text to how it originally was?

(For what it's worth, I'm still hoping we don't use "phase" in #7044 😉)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by birtles
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7240#issuecomment-1176960655 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 7 July 2022 02:08:02 UTC