- From: davidsgrogan via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 18:30:05 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
1. Explicit min-size beats automatic min-size, but auto min-size beats explicit max-size, which is why all engines say 200px. I think min beating max comes all the way from CSS2, due to the ordering of steps 2 and 3 in https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/#min-max-widths. Maybe something in css-sizing-3 reorganizes or restates that, but I didn't see it at a quick glance. 2. Agree, should be 30px 3. I think it's 200px because of the same reason from 1: mins beat maxes always, no matter where the mins or maxes ultimately came from -- GitHub Notification of comment by davidsgrogan Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7461#issuecomment-1176542884 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2022 18:30:07 UTC