Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color] [css-color-adjust] Consider reversing the resolution of #3847 (#6773)

Also in #3847 @upsuper [said](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3847#issuecomment-548106287):

> What I meant to say in #3847 (comment) is that Firefox's approach is not scalable to more keywords. It was done under the assumption that only currentcolor would behave that way. It's not touching serialization / Typed OM, but about the fact that animating with multiple parts which can change during animation could be challenging.

> But I might be wrong because most complexity of animating currentcolor comes from the fact that color itself can animate as well, so there might be some smart way to handle all the system color keywords which can only discretely switch (AFAIU) without adding too much complexity to implementation, but I'm not sure.

> Serialization / Typed OM is indeed something we need to consider, but I don't think that has or would introduce inherent complexity as far as we allow only linear combination of colors and keywords. But animation may have such complexity by itself.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6773#issuecomment-1019491713 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Sunday, 23 January 2022 13:59:52 UTC