- From: Lubomír Blažek via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 09:17:48 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The suggestions by @LeaVerou in #6330 are insightful yes, but maybe to much complex. To be clear, following behaviour in postcss was working even prior `noIsPseudoSelector`
```css
.a {
color: blue;
& .b {
@nest :not(.c)& {
color: red
}
}
}
.a {
color: blue
}
.a:not(.c) .b {
color: red
}
```
That why I though it was something that was part of the spec previously. Which is not the case, hence why I've created this issue. I think this syntax for selecting grandparent is less complex and it would benefit the spec.
There are a lot of cases where this might be useful, for example
```css
.ui-input {
& input {
@nest :not(.is-active)& {
color: red
}
}
}
.ui-input:not(.is-active) input {
color: red;
}
```
Once you are nested little deeper (for example in pseudo selector too), you have no simple way of accessing parent selector, for example component with different states.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by lubomirblazekcz
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6977#issuecomment-1019444525 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 23 January 2022 09:17:49 UTC