- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:29:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thinking more about it, I am not feeling totally comfortable with introducing a syntax that only checks the at-rule's name. It definitely looks nicer that way but I fear it may let authors conclude that they can use the rule without limitations. Though it doesn't cover any info about its descriptors or its syntax. Authors don't win anything if they test for an at-rule that way but the descriptors or the syntax they use isn't supported. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2463#issuecomment-1015761973 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2022 19:29:33 UTC