- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 13:40:03 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
To be clear, while I disagreed with these combinations not being useful, I'd fine with the limitations, for the reasons stated above. But, regarding `:not()`, I wonder if it could be allowed in its [basic L3 form](https://www.w3.org/TR/selectors-3//#negation): `:not(<simple-selector>)`, excluding nesting. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6952#issuecomment-1014560314 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 17 January 2022 13:40:04 UTC