- From: James Craig via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 03:21:36 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@Lorp wrote: > I believe the W3C regards it as unhealthy for the web if authors know this [rendered pixel ratio] value, opening the Pandora’s box of pixel popping. Presumably the same is true of the proposed `zoom`. @alastc wrote: > The issue with text shrinking at smaller viewport sizes is a problem, but I would say _that_ is what is hijacking the expected behaviour. (In the WCAG 2.1 timeframe the AGWG created a failure technique for that.) I think that's the source of Sara's frustration. If I understand correctly @alastc, you're saying that the demo cases here fail specific success criteria in WCAG 2.1? Could you link to the one you're thinking of? Thanks. -- GitHub Notification of comment by cookiecrook Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6869#issuecomment-1011745597 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2022 03:21:37 UTC