- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 23:47:45 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> since a NaN indicates a math error, preserving the authors precise intent wasn't considered too important Initial or inherited value isn't probably what they want either (otherwise they wouldn't be setting the property). > returning Infinity is the most likely value to produce a noticeably incorrect result. Yes, but it may be going overboard. If we only tried to maximize incorrect results, we could also say that setting `width` to a `calc()` producing `-1px` also becomes the maximum value instead of being clamped to 0px. > you might not know the value is invalid at computed-value time OK, good point about percentages. So rather than IACVT, I guess it would be that it "behaves as" the initial value or the inherited value (depending on whether the property is inherited). -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7067#issuecomment-1043638104 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2022 23:47:47 UTC