- From: Antti Koivisto via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 07:36:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
It is simpler to just make :has() invalid inside :has() and then follow the usual error handling rules, both in terms of logic and code. -- GitHub Notification of comment by anttijk Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6952#issuecomment-1042654695 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2022 07:36:25 UTC