- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:07:25 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Yes, 1 dimensional images are still `<image>`. I assume by that you mean to add `stripes()` to `<image>` but in properties like `border-color`, `outline-color` only `stripes()` is allowed, not the whole `<image>` syntax, right? > The whole reason they are 1 dimensional is so they can be used in borders, and they are painted alongside the border (like a brush). I seem to also remember discussing something like how gradient functions would also be augmented to accept a 1d image as the gradient line, so you could do `linear-gradient(45deg, stripes(...))`. Ok, so that sounds like we agree on this. > I suppose we'd need to define some handling for when a 1d image is used raw in places that expect a 2d image. E.g. it could be converted to a 2d image via horizontal or vertical repetition (or stretching). 🤷🏽♀️ > There's no "natural" way to tile a 1d image into 2d; at minimum, vertical or horizontal tiling are both completely reasonable. We could choose one way arbitrarily if we wanted, I suppose. Tiling or stretching sounds reasonable. Just to be clear we're on the same page here, I have two examples for a 100px by 100px image using `stripes(red, yellow, lime, blue)`: Horizontal tiling:  Vertical tiling:  Correct? If so, I'd aim for the same behavior as for `linear-gradient()`, i.e. draw them from top to bottom, tiling (or stretching) them horizontally. This will also allow to use it in `linear-gradient()` as mentioned earlier without surprises. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2532#issuecomment-1040844549 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2022 22:07:27 UTC