- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:45:20 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yes, 1 dimensional images are still `<image>`. The whole reason they are 1 dimensional is so they can be used in borders, and they are painted alongside the border (like a brush). I seem to also remember discussing something like how gradient functions would also be augmented to accept a 1d image as the gradient line, so you could do `linear-gradient(45deg, stripes(...))`. I suppose we'd need to define some handling for when a 1d image is used raw in places that expect a 2d image. E.g. it could be converted to a 2d image via horizontal or vertical repetition (or stretching). 🤷🏽♀️ -- GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2532#issuecomment-1040505437 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2022 16:45:21 UTC