- From: Ilya Streltsyn via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2022 09:31:05 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Since `:has()` has proven to be implementable and this one limitation helps keep its performance at least acceptable for most practical cases, maybe it's time to remove its "optional" status as well? -- GitHub Notification of comment by SelenIT Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6952#issuecomment-1030588599 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 5 February 2022 09:31:06 UTC