- From: davidsgrogan via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 22:28:05 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> @davidsgrogan > > > The flex item in question does not have a specified size suggestion, and is not replaced, and therefore it falls through to the final clause and uses its content size suggestion which is its min-content size in the main axis (100px). Therefore Firefox's behavior here is correct. > > — [#6794 (comment)](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1026183265) > > Unless there's something we missed? Sorry, I totally missed that paragraph. But the content size suggestion is not 100px, it's 50px (as mentioned in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1028193403). My point from https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1000059881 still stands. Slightly reworded: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/#min-size-auto gives a definition of automatic minimum sizing _for flex items_. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-4/#aspect-ratio-minimum gives a definition of automatic minimum sizing _for aspect-ratio elements_. As seen in this case, those definitions don't always agree. So what do we do in the case of a flex item with an aspect ratio? Which minimum do we apply? -- GitHub Notification of comment by davidsgrogan Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1029460538 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2022 22:28:07 UTC