- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 18:38:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Generalizing also doesn’t seem a good idea the more I think about it, especially if an author would want to feature detect this using [`at-rule()`](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2463#issuecomment-1016720310). Authors _can_ do feature detection, e.g. via `at-rule(@image; corner-shape: angle)`, indenpendent of the name of the rule. Though thinking more about it and looking at possible additions like compositions, I still believe it's better to handle image creation separately from image manipulation. And if we use a more specific name now, it is still possible to turn it into an alias for a more general one, but not the other way round. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6807#issuecomment-1233284347 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2022 18:38:17 UTC