- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:58:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
svgeesus has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == Pluralize `feature-*` to `features-*`? == Originally [raised by @jfkthame ](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7633#issue-1346860734): > (3) A really minor issue, but I have found myself repeatedly writing things like `@supports font-tech(features-opentype)`, and not getting the expected result because the correct keyword is `feature-opentype` (singular). To my mind, the `feature-*` keywords would read more naturally in the plural form (similarly to `font-tech(variations))`. Should we change them to plural, here and in CSS Fonts, before this is widely implemented and webcompat becomes a constraint? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7663 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2022 10:58:03 UTC