- From: Ian Kilpatrick via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 20:46:55 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Do web-developers expect the aspect-ratio to be preserved, even if this would result in the item overflowing its container, or do they expect it lose the aspect-ratio and shrink in order to minimize overflow? Yeah that framing is ok as well. Gets at the same point. > (They can always choose to prioritize the aspect ratio by not allowing shrinkage; this is about the default behavior.) Right its complicated by the fact that we allow shrinkage by default (initial value of `flex-shrink:1`), and folks rarely reach for `flex-shrink: 0` (e.g. lots of frameworks will simply do `flex:1`). -- GitHub Notification of comment by bfgeek Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1226306730 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2022 20:46:56 UTC