- From: jfkthame via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 14:12:20 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Re (2), I agree that for `@supports`, it will be possible to use boolean algebra to specify an `AND`ed combination of technologies, so supporting multiple tech keywords within `font-tech(...)` isn't essential. But the draft does currently say that: > The allowed values for the 'font-tech()' function are the same as those for the 'tech()' function in the '@font-face/src' descriptor which makes it sound as though whatever you can say in `tech(...)` within a `@font-face` rule should also be usable in `font-tech(...)` here. But then the syntax only allows for a single keyword. I don't feel strongly one way or the other about this, but I guess I do lean towards consistency between the `@font-face` and `@supports` forms, as I think that'll be less confusing for authors. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jfkthame Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7633#issuecomment-1224135264 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2022 14:12:22 UTC