- From: Bramus! via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:22:21 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> In https://drafts.csswg.org/indexes/ I see several "no-" but no "without-", so the former seems more CSS-y and is also shorter. Looking at that list, I see that these `no-` properties/values are (mostly) prefixed version of other ones that do not have a prefix. For example `no-clip` is the antonym of `clip`; not `has-clip` or `with-clip`. Working my way back from the suggested `select-no-dropdown`, it should go hand in hand with `select-dropdown` then? If `select-dropdown` does not make sense, and we do want to keep `select-with-dropdown`, its antonym – in similar fashion as `clip`/`no-clip` – should then become `select-no-with-dropdown`? From a linguistic POV the latter doesn’t make sense at all, and it would become `select-without-dropdown`. tl;dr If we have `select-with-dropdown`, `select-without-dropdown` seems like a better opposite to me. -- GitHub Notification of comment by bramus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7422#issuecomment-1223658041 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2022 07:22:23 UTC