- From: Daniel Holbert via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 20:50:35 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1785914 for the Firefox inconsistency that @davidsgrogan called out here (RE stretching vs. explicitly specifying a height on the item). I think I agree with Tab that the smaller size is correct, though (i.e. I think the Firefox behavior with `stretch`[1] is correct, and the Firefox behavior with an explicit height on the flex item[2] is incorrect). We're supposed to be honoring the smaller of the transferred size suggestion & the content size suggestion, and the bigger outcome in these examples is the transferred size suggestion & the smaller outcome is the content size suggestion, I think. [1] https://jsfiddle.net/dgrogan/o8a0vytj/2/ [2] https://jsfiddle.net/dgrogan/o8a0vytj/3/ -- GitHub Notification of comment by dholbert Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1219948484 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2022 20:50:37 UTC