- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 19:10:22 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> > So why should it be moved to the CSS Animations 2 spec.? > > Not moved there, but added as a possible value. If it's added there, it should still refer to the definition in Scroll-linked Animations to avoid double-specification. Though note that there are several specifications that extend existing property syntaxes. Examples are the [logical values for `float` and `clear` in CSS Logical 1](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-logical-1/#float-clear), [`running()` for `position` in CSS GCPM 3](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-gcpm-3/#running-syntax) or [`min-content`, `max-content` and `fit-content()` for `column-width` in CSS Sizing 3](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-3/#column-sizing). So it is not _required_ to add it there but it _could_ be added there for clarity. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7579#issuecomment-1209773169 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2022 19:10:23 UTC