- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 18:43:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `default algo`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: We have an unspecified default, the best available to the UA, which gets updated, only when there aren't any candidates. If you include any candidates, algorithm is mandatory` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <emilio> Subtopic: default algo<br> <fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7361<br> <chris> q+<br> <astearns> ack una<br> <emilio> una: I really like having no algo specified, just the value you want contrast against<br> <fantasai> emilio: if you fall off the list, do you implicitly end up with white and black and if white passes contrast testing...?<br> <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: No, you take the one that's more contrasting<br> <florian> q?<br> <fantasai> chris: They're not tried in order, just either give me white or black<br> <florian> q+<br> <lea> q+<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: if you want to specify the order, give a list<br> <lea> q-<br> <chris> q-<br> <lea> emilio: this is why it's not unfortunate that we're maximizing: color: color-mix(contrast-color(over var(--color), var(--color) 20%);<br> <astearns> ack florian<br> <emilio> dbaron: open to default in the future right?<br> <emilio> TabAtkins: yes<br> <dbaron> (I was responding to a statement of the proposed resolution that wasn't minuted.)<br> <emilio> florian: so options are either contrast-color(over ...), or contrast-color(over foo <algo>, a, b, c..) right?<br> <emilio> astearns: objections with going with (4) + (5)<br> <emilio> Proposed: We have an unspecified default, the best available to the UA, which gets updated, only when there aren't any candidates. If you include any candidates, algorithm is mandatory<br> <fantasai> contrast algorithm is optional, and defaults to the best available to the UA (which gets updated over time), if no candidate colors are specified<br> <fantasai> yes<br> <emilio> RESOLVED: We have an unspecified default, the best available to the UA, which gets updated, only when there aren't any candidates. If you include any candidates, algorithm is mandatory<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7361#issuecomment-1203086677 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2022 18:43:47 UTC