- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 14:22:41 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
In section 3, Success Criteria, the old charter (mostly) used the term "module", which has been replaced with the term "specification" in this proposed update. It should shift back to module, This was intentional, because higher up in the charter, we claim > There is a single deliverable, the CSS specification. The CSS specification is large, and is divided into a series of modules. The Process itself doesn't define the word "Specification" (it talks about _technical reports_), so we're free to use it this way and define each of our technical reports to be a module if we like it. But we should try and keep it consistent. Similarly, in section 8, we should probably say either "technical report" rather than "Web Specification". -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7468#issuecomment-1201274120 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 1 August 2022 14:22:43 UTC