- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:11:42 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `HTML widget rendering PRs`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Acccept Florian's pr (7224) and submit the corresponding one to HTML.` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <TabAtkins> Topic: HTML widget rendering PRs<br> <TabAtkins> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/7224<br> <TabAtkins> florian: A while back, zcorpan made a PR against CSS UI and HTML to link the specs together better, and give HTML a way to define how appearance:none works for the different widgets<br> <TabAtkins> florian: The two specs shared an algo for exactly how the appearance disabled, etc<br> <TabAtkins> florian: Normatively it was fine, but editorially I thought the css/html split wasn't ideal. The CSS spec ended up defining a button, slider, dropdown, etc, but in a very lightweight way.<br> <TabAtkins> florian: Then there was back-and-forth bouncing for the dfns.<br> <TabAtkins> florian: This new PR reorganzies the concept, putting the hTML-specific stuff into HTML and defining some concepts in CSS that HTML can rely on<br> <TabAtkins> florian: Luckily zcorpan likes the rebalancing.<br> <astearns> q+<br> <TabAtkins> florian: And for clarity I did this with fantasai so that makes three of us that like it<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen_: Just reitering, looks like zcorpan likes the approach, and it's equivlaent except transform-origin<br> <astearns> q-<br> <TabAtkins> florian: Right, forgot that normative difference. We have a separate issue for that question.<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen_: Second question is about revert-level vs revert, he was wondering if this was meant to be revert-layer<br> <TabAtkins> florian: defer to fantasai<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: Yes, of course<br> <Rossen_> q?<br> <TabAtkins> florian: So proposed resolution is, after correcting the revert-level mistake, accept the PR and submit the corresponding HTML half as well<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen_: Comments or objections?<br> <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Acccept Florian's pr (7224) and submit the corresponding one to HTML.<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/7224#issuecomment-1104119767 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2022 16:11:43 UTC