- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 13:22:05 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> By the way, I just noticed the document links to a (for now empty) separate errata page. That's the historical practice, but [as of Process 2021](https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#errata), that's no longer the only option: I agree that adding a separate blank errata document is pointless and stupid. But pubrules checker still complains if it is not there, so in the interests of not further delaying publication while arguing that the checker should be changed, I did the pointless and stupid thing. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6962#issuecomment-1088697648 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2022 13:22:07 UTC