- From: davidsgrogan via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 20:29:02 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> It could be, but it feels like a potentially arcane way of doing that. If we want to address that use-case, perhaps there's a more direct way to do so? Yes, you are right, "one weird trick" is probably not the best way to address that use-case. > > 1. Seems to me the clear answer to the CSS-comment question above is '150px'. But maybe I'm missing something. > > Based on where this thread is trending, I think the answer to [my css-comment-question](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6457#issuecomment-915415947) should in fact be "content-height", **not** 150px. Ah, yes, you are right. I meant 150px if we went in the other direction on this issue. Thanks for the good responses. I now get it and am in total agreement that `min-height: min-content` and friends should result in an indefinite height. -- GitHub Notification of comment by davidsgrogan Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6457#issuecomment-931641437 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2021 20:29:04 UTC