Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Should forced-colors override `border-image`? (#5469)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `CSS Color Adjust`.

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;fantasai> Topic: CSS Color Adjust<br>
&lt;fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5469#issuecomment-707918323<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: This is the only issue open to block us from CR<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: we pinged you repeatedly for the answer, and no response<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: So put it on the agenda.<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: Have some colleagues closer to the implementation, will tag them.<br>
&lt;fremy> fremy: wouldn't mind keeping the border image, just in case<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: hopefully close on this before the end of the week<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: horizontal review issue?<br>
&lt;fantasai> fantasai: We only have the one issue open. Horizontal review is done. We want to transition to CR, once the border-image issue is closed.<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: should we resolve provisionally, or resolve next week?<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: up to the chair :)<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: Current spec doesn't override border-image?<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: current spec calls for that I believe<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: border-image is not on the list of properties getting overridden<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: That reflects current implementations. Don't see why we'd want to change it. Does anyone have a different opinion?<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: We're not trying to resolve on the open question right now.<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: Question is do we want to move to CR?<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: Current spec matches our expectations<br>
&lt;fremy> +1 to what Rossen_ said; also border-image is quite rare, it's tough to say why it's used because it can be creative<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: Question is, do we want to resolve regardless of how that issue is resolved, or do we want to wait for that issue before deciding?<br>
&lt;tantek> q?<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: Currently we can proceed with CR. I will follow up with folks here today and have closing arguments in the issue by end of week<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: if we end up changing, let's handle it later<br>
&lt;fantasai> tantek: Is the issue linked in the draft?<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: no<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: if we can't close this, put a link in there<br>
&lt;tantek> perhaps in the status section<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: OK, calling for provisional CR transition resolution<br>
&lt;fantasai> Rossen_: any last concerns to moving forward with transition?<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5469#issuecomment-915393041 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2021 16:36:35 UTC