- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 22:28:09 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@bfgeek I think it is. The goal of the automatic minimum size is to prevent things from becoming so small that their contents are unreadable (overflowing or shrunk to zero). The preferred size still accounts for the aspect ratio, so if the column is allowed to grow wider the item will be square as intended, but when there isn't enough space in the column (and the item's own contents are small enough to fit), it won't overflow the column. That's a good behavior for the automatic minimum size, imho. If the author wants the aspect ratio to force overflow, they can set the width or min-width to max-content instead of auto. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6069#issuecomment-914668439 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2021 22:28:11 UTC