- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 20:18:37 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> We kindof already did that, fwiw. See e.g. #3198 (files) That was a *much* simpler transform than what we're discussing here. Quite a lot of properties just got a "no"->"discrete" transform, for example, whereas here each of them would need individual attention. > It does not. I obviously agree with you, but it's not well-specified. Order is *rarely* important in CSS, but *occasionally* it might be, so if we want this to be specified properly we need to provide these details. Or avoid the issue by deferring to something that already likely normalizes, like serialization. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6762#issuecomment-952291524 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2021 20:18:39 UTC