- From: Dan Burzo via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:50:11 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
danburzo has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-color-4] L as `<percentage>` in `lab()` and `oklab()` == In the context of [adding `oklab()` and `oklch()` syntaxes](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6642) which use `<percentage>` for the L channel that map to its canonical `[0, 1]` range, the decision to use `<percentage>` for `lab()` and `lch()` ([previously discussed](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4477)) to map to its canonical `[0, 100]` range feels inconsistent. Since the spec has recently included a [breaking change in the definition of `color(xyz)`](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6722), now might be a good opportunity to revisit the decision to use `<percentage>` in `lab()` and `lch()`? This will also impact the usage of `color()` if [these color spaces will be allowed as identifiers](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6741), if you're allowed to use either `<number>` or `<percentage>` for the Lightness. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6761 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 25 October 2021 12:50:14 UTC