- From: jsnkuhn via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 15:32:29 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
thanks tab, i get it now. The `background-image` would load and render regardless of whether `background-video` loaded in or not which is most likely waistful. This also makes the fallback ideas in `image()` make more sense as well. image() and video() would create self contained either/or situations. My only other general thought is how many folks are going to feel so odd about writing: >background-image: video(); that they would default to just use `background` to avoid the cognitive dissonance of a video() value inside a "image" property. And then have to deal with the implications of the `background` shorthand resetting things. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jsnkuhn Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6732#issuecomment-945145680 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 17 October 2021 15:32:31 UTC