- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 22:33:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Layers terminology bikeshed`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Keep "layers" and close issue no change` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic: Layers terminology bikeshed<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5840<br> <dael> miriam: Another one open since the beginning. bikeshedding what we call layers.<br> <fantasai> +1 to layers<br> <dael> miriam: No alternative people liked better when we discussed. Seemed time to close or make a change<br> <dael> astearns: I think at this point there is a slight bit of reason not to make a change. In part b/c iml has started and articles written using layers term<br> <florian> keep it as is<br> <miriam> +1<br> <dael> astearns: I don't think it would keep us from changing, but would need good arguments for another term<br> <dael> astearns: Anyone want to argue layers is not the right word?<br> <dael> astearns: Prop: Keep "layers" and close issue no change<br> <dael> RESOLVED: Keep "layers" and close issue no change<br> <dael> astearns: Do ping Brian to make sure he's okay since he's not on the call and he opened the issue<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5840#issuecomment-937274493 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2021 22:33:41 UTC