- From: jfkthame via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 09:30:17 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
If we're going to do this addition (I don't personally have a clear idea of how useful it'll be, but also don't see any reason to oppose it), then I think we should consider simply having `r` versions of *all* the font-relative units in https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#font-relative-lengths. So that would mean adding `rcap` as well as `rex`, `rch`, and `ric`. (No, I don't have a concrete use case for it. But it seems logical to do the full set, so that authors know that for *any* font-relative unit, they have both the "local" value and the root-element value available, rather than trying to pick and choose which of the units get a root-element version and which don't.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by jfkthame Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6034#issuecomment-935836952 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2021 09:30:19 UTC