- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:55:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Sure, impls did all sorts of weird things in the bad old days, but is there a *current* compat need for this? Do you know of pages that are currently broken with the specified Syntax behavior, but would be fixed if we allowed lone surrogates to be produced by the escape syntax? > The CSS1 syntax for Unicode escapes[...] Sure, I'm still just not sure how a CSS1 spec detail is relevant to anything here. CSS2 was first published more than twenty years ago. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6352#issuecomment-983054796 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2021 21:55:35 UTC