- From: Šime Vidas via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 20:20:56 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
simevidas has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-position] Animatable and Animation type fields are contradictory for position property == Link to spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-position/#position-property The definition card for the `position` property includes these fields: * Animatable: no * Animation type: discrete How can that be? Doesn’t discrete mean that it *is* animatable? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6846 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2021 20:20:58 UTC