- From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:49:42 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I think this almost makes `:has()` equivalent to the [old `:subject` proposal](https://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-css3-selectors-20001005/#subject-pseudo) (which was used to mark which piece of a selector was the subject), with the exception that you could still have more than one `:has()` on the rightmost piece-between-combinators. (Or do you propose to limit that as well? How much complexity and value does allowing more than one `:has()` yield?) (I did suggest a few times that `:subject` might be preferable because it might be easier to implement; I found [one brief reference](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2019Jul/0002.html) but I think I'd written or said something longer at some point before that.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6845#issuecomment-982707657 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2021 14:49:44 UTC