- From: Sam Sneddon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:20:19 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
gsnedders has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-overflow-3] should -webkit-discard be a valid value for continue? == https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow-3/#propdef-continue / https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow-3/#valdef-continue--webkit-discard Per the value grammar for `continue`, `-webkit-discard` is not a valid value, despite it being set as the value of `continue` by the `-webkit-line-clamp` shorthand. I'm unaware of any other case where a property has a value that can _only_ be set via a shorthand, hence this feels like it's adding an oddity (and quite probably causing extra implementation complexity as a result, for unclear benefit to anyone). It's also somewhat surprising that a value for `continue` is defined within the "Limiting Visible Lines: the line-clamp shorthand property" section, without "Fragmentation of Overflow: the continue property" even mentioning that value. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6842 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 29 November 2021 21:20:20 UTC