- From: Francesco Improta via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:53:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> How about adding a new parameter? Just like `minmax(min-value, max-value, more-prior-item)` The third param `more-prior-item` specifies which one has the priority. > > eg. `minmax(20%, 250px, 'min')` is equal to `minmax(20%, 250px)` > eg. `minmax(20%, 250px, 'max')` makes max wins over min, which could solve the maxwidth situation. > I like this approach. However, the `'min'` case would be redundant because it's the default. It could work only with specifying `max`. What do you think? -- GitHub Notification of comment by zetareticoli Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1102#issuecomment-975290964 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 22 November 2021 08:53:11 UTC