- From: jfkthame via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 08:56:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Agree with Myles, I don't favor `ability`; I think `tech[nology]` is a more natural term here. Personally, I don't think the length of the full `font-technology` form is a problem; clarity is good, and I'm not expecting authors to be typing large numbers of `@supports font-technology(....)` blocks by hand (and if they do need to, copy/paste and autocomplete are a thing....) -- GitHub Notification of comment by jfkthame Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6791#issuecomment-964912769 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2021 08:57:00 UTC