- From: Claude Pache via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 16:56:09 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Just for clarity. Both specificity and pseudo-element handling of `:is()` are correctly mentioned in the spec. My issue is that (unless #2284 is fixed) the specific Note in section 17.1 is currently misleading, because developers *will* try to wrap some selector list containing some partially supported pseudo-element with `:is()`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by claudepache Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6792#issuecomment-959729039 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2021 16:56:11 UTC